Front Page

Content

Authors

Game Index

Forums

Site Tools

Submissions

About

KK
Kevin Klemme
March 09, 2020
35860 2
Hot
KK
Kevin Klemme
January 27, 2020
21320 0
Hot
KK
Kevin Klemme
August 12, 2019
7839 0
Hot
O
oliverkinne
December 19, 2023
5261 0
Hot
O
oliverkinne
December 14, 2023
4660 0
Hot

Mycelia Board Game Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
December 12, 2023
2943 0
O
oliverkinne
December 07, 2023
3006 0
Hot

River Wild Board Game Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
December 05, 2023
2647 0
O
oliverkinne
November 30, 2023
2910 0
J
Jackwraith
November 29, 2023
3471 0
Hot
O
oliverkinne
November 28, 2023
2712 0
S
Spitfireixa
October 24, 2023
4417 0
Hot
O
oliverkinne
October 17, 2023
3355 0
Hot
O
oliverkinne
October 10, 2023
2602 0
O
oliverkinne
October 09, 2023
2609 0
O
oliverkinne
October 06, 2023
2808 0

Outback Crossing Review

Board Game Reviews
×
Bugs: Recent Topics Paging, Uploading Images & Preview (11 Dec 2020)

Recent Topics paging, uploading images and preview bugs require a patch which has not yet been released.

× A place to talk about stuff that doesn't belong anywhere else.

Coronavirus

More
18 May 2021 18:21 #323291 by mtagge
Replied by mtagge on topic Coronavirus

jeb wrote: My biggest fault with the new CDC recommendations isn't about the science--I would bet the science behind it is solid as a rock. The issue is it assumes people follow and have followed CDC guidance to this point. It is not "tested for bad actors" in my profession's parlance. People will fake the cards, people will not wear masks when called for, &c. And removing the CDC guidance removes a solid, easily conveyed excuse to handle the Rick Schroeders of the world (that's my local Costco, God bless) that want to give people a hard time for doing their already-hard jobs. I think they could have made the recommendation and included metrics or other measures to explain why it's being done, so folks know why it might have to go back in place if/when the numbers climb again.

Okay, but what is the conditions required for us to go maskless? People are going to behave as they always have. Since except for edge cases the only people harmed by not following the guidelines are, those not following the guidelines I don't really get what the problem is. If the sticker on the ladder says don't stand on the top step, well you live with the consequences.

It's like at the workplace. You don't just say, "that's not going to work". You say, "how about we do this instead, it is better because reason 1, reason 2, reason 3."

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
18 May 2021 18:25 #323292 by charlest
Replied by charlest on topic Coronavirus

mtagge wrote:

jeb wrote: My biggest fault with the new CDC recommendations isn't about the science--I would bet the science behind it is solid as a rock. The issue is it assumes people follow and have followed CDC guidance to this point. It is not "tested for bad actors" in my profession's parlance. People will fake the cards, people will not wear masks when called for, &c. And removing the CDC guidance removes a solid, easily conveyed excuse to handle the Rick Schroeders of the world (that's my local Costco, God bless) that want to give people a hard time for doing their already-hard jobs. I think they could have made the recommendation and included metrics or other measures to explain why it's being done, so folks know why it might have to go back in place if/when the numbers climb again.

Okay, but what is the conditions required for us to go maskless? People are going to behave as they always have. Since except for edge cases the only people harmed by not following the guidelines are, those not following the guidelines I don't really get what the problem is. If the sticker on the ladder says don't stand on the top step, well you live with the consequences.

It's like at the workplace. You don't just say, "that's not going to work". You say, "how about we do this instead, it is better because reason 1, reason 2, reason 3."


Selfishly, I wouldn't be opposed to retaining a local mask ordinance until my seven year old daughter can get vaccinated.
The following user(s) said Thank You: ubarose, cdennett, BillyBobThwarton

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
18 May 2021 19:19 #323297 by jeb
Replied by jeb on topic Coronavirus
Maskless, forever, back to pre-COVID would involve assumptions/demonstrations of herd immunity, which is a LOOOONG ways off given how everyone is acting. I mean, unless you're in New Zealand or whatever. In the US it's a ways.

Masks off for outside is good now in most parts of the country where you have exposure/vaccination rates north of 50% and more like 70%.

If you are fully vaccinated, you don't need to wear a mask to protect yourself unless in a high-risk setting like a crowded interior space. Even then, your chances of getting seriously ill if you do get infected are very low. BUT, if you do get infected, you might be carrying enough load to infect the un-or-under-vaccinated like my 9yo son, and no one wants that on their conscience.

On a walk? I have one in my hand in case I stop and chat someone up for a spell.

At the store, I wear one.

At a meal indoors with fully-vaxxed folk, I would not wear one.

At a meal outdoors with a mix of fully-vaxxed and un-vaxxed, I would wear one.

It's a mix. Just trying to minimize risks. They just don't bother me that much.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
18 May 2021 20:54 #323303 by Sagrilarus
Replied by Sagrilarus on topic Coronavirus

CranBerries wrote: Popular author Michael Lewis (The Big Short, Moneyball, etc) has come out with a book arguing that the CDC totally screwed things up. His interview with Ezra Klein was interesting. Here is the transcript that I am too lazy to summarize:

www.nytimes.com/2021/05/11/podcasts/ezra...ewis-transcript.html

He does go into the history of the agency, and argues that the shift from career civil servant to political appointments has damaged the agency, but there is a lot going on. I'm not super invested in defending or destroying the CDC, just frustrated, like all of us.

MICHAEL LEWIS: Key failure number one, not facing up to the severity of what was going on in Wuhan as early as you could have done it. I would say January 20, when my characters have a real bead on what the transmissibility and the lethality of it is. And they had connections within the CDC. They’re talking. They’re trying to get them to pay attention. The “head-in-the-sandness,” kind of, of it.

Two, being proprietary about COVID testing so that they created in our government a single point of failure. So that when their test didn’t work, we had no test. And that’s not just the CDC. That’s the FDA, because the FDA was insisting that people use the CDC’s test.

We have more microbiology labs than any other country on Earth. They could all have whipped up COVID tests and some of them did. We could have done it a completely different way. Not just that the tests failed, but instead of responding to the failure by saying, this isn’t working, we got to find a different way, clinging to the authority to create a test. That would be two.


Three, in the midst of all this, not being able to stand up to Donald Trump and say, what you’re saying about this is false. You’d lose your job maybe. But there was a public information role that they failed repeatedly with. And they failed in both directions. It’s interesting. Saying that masks didn’t do anything, because they didn’t have masks. But also, remember early on there was an obsession with fomites. You can get this thing off of surfaces. And you were cleaning your newspaper before you got it off your front porch if you got —

EZRA KLEIN: Yeah, people were Lysoling their groceries.

MICHAEL LEWIS: All that. Think about the expense that the whole society has gone to because the CDC only like last week said, actually, that’s not that big a deal. They could have said that last May. So the guidance has been bizarre.


Fine hindsight.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Cranberries

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
19 May 2021 07:45 #323308 by n815e
Replied by n815e on topic Coronavirus
I’m fully vaccinated and I’m still wearing a mask. I don’t see how it is anything more than a minor inconvenience (at worst).

The whole conversation around masks still seems to be about protecting yourself. Unless the science has changed, the last I recall seeing is that masks aren’t great at protecting the wearers from disease, but they are great at preventing the wearers from spreading disease.
The following user(s) said Thank You: ubarose, Dr. Mabuse

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
19 May 2021 09:02 #323309 by ChristopherMD
Replied by ChristopherMD on topic Coronavirus
I'm still keeping masks in my car but only putting one on when it's required or someone asks me to.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
19 May 2021 18:15 #323326 by n815e
Replied by n815e on topic Coronavirus
My three year old and I have been sick with a “stomach bug” for the last couple of days. Took him to his doc and they did a covid test. He is positive. So I went to the local clinic and tested negative, even though we have the same symptoms.

Maybe because I’m vaccinated? I don’t know.

But this is killing me. We are super careful with everything. I don’t know how he could have been exposed.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
19 May 2021 19:02 #323327 by hotseatgames
Replied by hotseatgames on topic Coronavirus
My teenage sons just got their first shots today. I'm very pleased.
The following user(s) said Thank You: jeb, Cranberries, n815e

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 May 2021 11:00 #323338 by jeb
Replied by jeb on topic Coronavirus
Ugh, sorry n815e, a quick recovery to you both.

Not sure which tests you each took, but some have a high false-negative rate. this came up in the public discourse when (someonefamous) took four tests, and two came back positive, and they concluded "something was fishy." It wasn't. They were just seeing that false negative rate play out--that they had two positive tests indicated they were certainly positive.
The following user(s) said Thank You: n815e

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 May 2021 11:38 #323339 by Shellhead
Replied by Shellhead on topic Coronavirus
A couple of weeks after my second Pfizer shot, I started going back to the gym, where masks were mandatory except in the pool area with a new maximum population of 7 people. Mask compliance was about 90%, with me not counting masks that only cover the mouth or the chin or the neck. Since this new CDC guideline, mask compliance at my gym has dropped to about 30%, and the gym was fairly busy for the first time since March of 2020. I'm going to keep wearing a mask there for now, even though it sucks to practically inhale my mask when really exerting myself.
The following user(s) said Thank You: n815e

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 May 2021 12:02 - 20 May 2021 12:53 #323343 by dysjunct
Replied by dysjunct on topic Coronavirus
As of yesterday I am two weeks past my second Moderna shot. Might lick a public doorknob to celebrate.
Last edit: 20 May 2021 12:53 by dysjunct.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Gary Sax, RobertB, san il defanso

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 May 2021 12:25 #323344 by n815e
Replied by n815e on topic Coronavirus
Thank you, jeb.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
23 May 2021 11:57 #323395 by ubarose
Replied by ubarose on topic Coronavirus

n815e wrote: I’m fully vaccinated and I’m still wearing a mask. I don’t see how it is anything more than a minor inconvenience (at worst).

The whole conversation around masks still seems to be about protecting yourself. Unless the science has changed, the last I recall seeing is that masks aren’t great at protecting the wearers from disease, but they are great at preventing the wearers from spreading disease.


Had a crazy making conversation with a woman who was complaining about CT’s indoor mask mandate. We had just witnessed a woman and her child being denied entry to a Dunkin Donuts for not wearing a mask. Despite the fact that she told me herself that her son had just received his first shot last week, she couldn’t connect the dots that:

1. We still have many under 35 year olds, like her son, that are not fully vaccinated.
2. There isn’t even a vaccine approved for children yet.
3. These yet unvaccinated people sometimes need to be in places like work, school, or even just shopping for essentials.
4. Without mandates, we can’t trust unvaccinated people to wear masks to protect other unvaccinated people.

It finally clicked when I asked her, “How old is your son?”
Her: 25
Me: About how old do you think the DD cashier is?
Her: About 20.
Me: About how old do think the woman and child who got kicked out were?
Her: About 25 and 7..... oooohhhh.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Msample, n815e

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
23 May 2021 13:11 #323396 by Gary Sax
Replied by Gary Sax on topic Coronavirus
Had one of those incredibly disturbing covid denial conspiracy conversations with my grandmother in law, who is 87. Absolutely insane, depressing shit.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
23 May 2021 13:43 #323397 by Msample
Replied by Msample on topic Coronavirus
I have seen multiple people declare that they don't need the vaccine because their prior positive case of Covid and the resulting antibodies "gives them natural immunity".. Cue the Picard face palm.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Dr. Mabuse, n815e

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: Gary Sax
Time to create page: 0.304 seconds