Front Page

Content

Authors

Game Index

Forums

Site Tools

Submissions

About

You May Also Like...

O
oliverkinne
December 14, 2023
Hot

Mycelia Board Game Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
December 07, 2023

River Wild Board Game Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
November 30, 2023
J
Jackwraith
November 29, 2023
Hot
O
oliverkinne
October 09, 2023
O
oliverkinne
October 06, 2023

Outback Crossing Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
October 05, 2023
O
oliverkinne
October 02, 2023

Forests of Pangaia Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
September 29, 2023

Bagh Chal Review

Board Game Reviews
AL
Andi Lennon
September 28, 2023
O
oliverkinne
September 25, 2023

Castle Panic Review

Board Game Reviews
GS
Gary Sax
June 21, 2023
Hot
O
oliverkinne
June 09, 2023
Hot
O
oliverkinne
June 02, 2023
Hot

Ahoy Board Game Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
May 26, 2023

Village Rails Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
May 19, 2023

The Spill Board Game Review

Board Game Reviews

Play Matt: White Eagle Defiant Review

Hot
MT Updated October 12, 2020
 
4.0
 
0.0 (0)
5806 0
Play Matt: White Eagle Defiant Review

Game Information

Publisher
Players
1 - 2
There Will Be Games

Getting White Eagle Defiant to the table involved a lot of dirt. First, there was dusting off my plexiglass sheet to sit over the paper map. It'd been a long time since I'd needed it. Then, punching out the counters which had this weird, gritty feeling from the printing that persisted all through the first play.  I had to wash my hands afterwards. Then there was the faff of setup, stacking counters in boxes on an unfamiliar map of Poland. I felt untidy and begrimed by the time I sat down to play.

Which is kind of appropriate. White Eagle Defiant tells the story of how Hitler invaded Poland, in defiance of international law, and started World War 2. The Polish player cannot "win" in the traditional sense: rather, winning is about delaying the German advance for as long as possible. It's based on an earlier game from the same designers, Brave Little Belgium, which won acclaim for it's ease and excitement of play. With only six pages of rules, a half sheet of counters and a 45-60 minute play time, White Eagle Defiant is also very accessible for a wargame.

It's also very solo-able in the grand old tradition of playing both sides yourself, which is what I'm doing. Not knowing the subtleties I do the obvious and have the German forces north of Poland attack the border forts, aiming to capture victory spaces. Right away, it all falls apart. Combat in the game is as simple as it is capricious, with each counter having a hit number they must equal or exceed with a single roll to win an attack. The forts prove too much, and the Germans fall back, defeated.

There's more where they came from, though. This is a battle of attrition: the German forces are superior in both number and quality. It's all about staving them off. After the mandated start by Germany's Army Group North, I grab a chit from a cup to determine who goes next. Each formation has a chit in there, along with a number of events and four "end turn" counters. If all four come out before all the troops have activated, they're stuck until the following turn.

EidXPV0XcAARFgV.jpg

Southern Poland is next. There's only a limited amount the Poles can do right at the start of the game, mostly reinforcing forts and protecting weaker pieces. So I rearrange the martial furniture a bit and hope. When, a couple of chits later, the Southern German forces fall upon Krakow, it’s enough to repulse them. In the north, meanwhile, the Poles go on the offensive, capturing a German fort, which is worth a point to them.

After another turn of failure, the Germans are in trouble. If they don’t make headway into Poland early, they get combat penalties to simulate the allies coming to Poland’s aid. A six is always a hit, though, and Panzer units get to roll two dice, scoring two hits on a double. So a double six during an attack on a victory space saves German fortunes. With easy Blitzkrieg rules, it gets them back into the game.

Indeed, the game swings away fast for Poland from this point. By mid-game the Germans have triggered a second condition, having taken enough cities to bring the Soviets into the war. It strikes me that if this were a two-player game then, by now, the Polish player would have little to do but hope. Beleaguered from both east and west, it is White Eagle Defiant no longer, but a rout. 

It’s a few days before I get the game out again. It’s fast-playing, taking under an hour, and the sense of grit has gone. But it’s still a pain to sort and set up. The lure is there, though: that first game was undeniably unpredictable, and I’m sure there are more strategies to explore. I get an old counter tray out of the loft, which helps, and go to it again. 

Ej6JBeDWoAEEzyo.jpg

This time, I look at the German situation more carefully. I make sure to guard the forts and paths in the north and assault the Poles from multiple directions. In the south, although an assault on Krakow is inevitable, it’s also possible to slip round it into the less defended Polish underbelly. Putting on the other hat, there’s a constant tension between defending the strongpoints and putting speedbumps in the way of German units. Looking at the point to point map, it seems incredible to have so much choice in such a small space.

A more measured approach gets early gains and stops the threat of allied involvement. But the Germans find themselves spread too thin and unable to make mid-game headway. Things get worse after two turns that end early thanks to the chit pull. In this situation, the Germans can roll to act but doing so risks advancing a “breakdown” track which will lose them the game if it reaches five. It gets to four, and it feels wise to stall the advance.

Warsaw becomes key. The Germans have it surrounded and it’s worth three points. If they can take it, not only will they be close to victory but it will bring the Soviets in for the final turns, putting more pressure on the Poles. For two turns the Germans throw everything they have at it. The pressure and excitement are intense. Finally, it falls but too late: a final turn that, again, ends prematurely, hands a win to Poland.

Of course, it’s a “win” only in the sense of delaying the inevitable. By the end, there’s barely a Polish unit on the map and I’m again left wondering if a real Polish player would be left bored. But the game denotes victory as holding out longer than their historical counterpart. It’s a great way to make a tight game out of a hopeless situation.

EidiYNuXcAA9bQD.jpg

Reading a bit about the real history, I figure out that counters in this game are a rough representation of a corps: about 25-50k soldiers. I also learn that France really did send units into Germany to relieve pressure on Poland. So the threat of an allied offensive was real. Looking at maps of the fight though, I can’t transpose them onto the game board. I get no sense of the shape of history.

That doesn’t stop my enjoyment of White Eagle Defiant, and it’s likely a lack of imagination on my part. Over two more games, the shape I do see is one dictated by dice rolls and chit pulls but where decisions still matter. In the third, the Germans look to be rolling to victory. But they leave their southern gains weakly defended, allowing a single wounded Polish armour unit to limp in and liberate them. In the fourth, the Poles collapse in the south but hold strong in the north. It becomes a touch and go tussle to keep the Soviets out of the war: they enter, but too late, and the game ends in a draw.

There’s a lot in the slim case of White Eagle Defiant, excitement and detail slipped neatly away between bigger boxes. Four games, four different histories, all tight and thrilling down to the last turn. I’m sure it would reveal more with the creativity of a human opponent, but I can’t shake the sense playing Poland would prove a let-down after midgame. But again, maybe that’s as it should be. A game about the invasion of Poland mirroring the real-life let-down of Poland by its allies, who came too late to save it from bloodshed and horror.  


Editor reviews

1 reviews

Rating 
 
4.0
White Eagle Defiant
A great wargame with a rare combination of variety, excitement and accessibility, but the chaos and lack of decisions on the Polish side may prove offputting for some.
MT
#1 Reviewer 286 reviews
Matt Thrower (He/Him)
Head Writer

Matt has been writing about tabletop games professional since 2012, blogging since 2006 and playing them since he could talk.

image

Articles by Matt

User reviews

There are no user reviews for this listing.
Already have an account? or Create an account
Log in to comment

fightcitymayor's Avatar
fightcitymayor replied the topic: #315018 12 Oct 2020 11:29
This is a Hollandspiele game, and I keep wanting them to go fully-fledged publisher instead of farming out their games to a 3rd party (Blue Panther) print-on-demand model. They have received a lot of acclaim both within & without the typical grognard community, and it seems like they are ready for the big time. Maybe increase the production value a bit while holding the line on price via decent print runs. They won't be GMT, but I feel like they could be a bigger company with a broader reach with the right amount of effort. But what do I know.

I mean, speaking of wargame publishers, Worthington seems to have consistently good distribution via all the usual suspects, and their games have been distinctly mediocre for years now. Hollandspiele's stuff is deliberately niche, but rarely disappoints. They should switch places on the pecking order totem pole.
ThirstyMan's Avatar
ThirstyMan replied the topic: #315051 13 Oct 2020 08:24
Mark Herman's Empire of the Sun is a similar thing.

The Japanese win if they can delay the inevitable US victory and it is also excellent as a solo game.
Gary Sax's Avatar
Gary Sax replied the topic: #315056 13 Oct 2020 10:17
I can rarely get into these opponent never had a chance games. It's what makes strategic american civil war games hard. Good review though, thanks for reviewing hollandspiele stuff. I've always been interested in them.
Msample's Avatar
Msample replied the topic: #315059 13 Oct 2020 10:39

fightcitymayor wrote: This is a Hollandspiele game, and I keep wanting them to go fully-fledged publisher instead of farming out their games to a 3rd party (Blue Panther) print-on-demand model. They have received a lot of acclaim both within & without the typical grognard community, and it seems like they are ready for the big time. Maybe increase the production value a bit while holding the line on price via decent print runs. They won't be GMT, but I feel like they could be a bigger company with a broader reach with the right amount of effort. But what do I know.

I mean, speaking of wargame publishers, Worthington seems to have consistently good distribution via all the usual suspects, and their games have been distinctly mediocre for years now. Hollandspiele's stuff is deliberately niche, but rarely disappoints. They should switch places on the pecking order totem pole.


I think the somewhat boutique subject matter of most of Hollandspiel's games precludes them from having the usual print run of 1500-2000 copies of a game, thus the print on demand model.

Worthington seems to be the non block version of Columbia - occasional interesting subjects, but executed in a bland and somewhat cookie cutter manner. The only game of theirs that remotely interested me was HEARTS AND MINDS, which was decidedly a mixed bag. Whenever I see a new release mentioned, further investigation leaves me shaking my head and walking away, an easy pass.
Pugnax555's Avatar
Pugnax555 replied the topic: #315064 13 Oct 2020 11:01
Thanks for the review. Also interested in Hollandspiele and Tom Russell's games (side note: she had some pretty big news last week if you missed it ).

IMO, it seems that Hollandspiele has stepped into (and nicely filled) the niche/POD hole that was left when Victory Point Games ultimately decided a few years ago that "the bling's the thing" should be their new motto and they significantly upped their prices.
Sagrilarus's Avatar
Sagrilarus replied the topic: #315067 13 Oct 2020 12:16

Pugnax555 wrote: Thanks for the review. Also interested in Hollandspiele and Tom Russell's games (side note: she had some pretty big news last week if you missed it ).

IMO, it seems that Hollandspiele has stepped into (and nicely filled) the niche/POD hole that was left when Victory Point Games ultimately decided a few years ago that "the bling's the thing" should be their new motto and they significantly upped their prices.


Thanks for the word. I just sent a "Thank you sir" response to her a few weeks back, did not know.

I've been doing Print 'n Play for Hollandspiele and even paying double if I make two copies. They're cheaper than sin -- I think the expensive ones are $15 and I get to control the product quality, saving money when I want to, blinging when I don't, and frankly using what's lying around because I don't feel like going out to buy stuff. Having a band saw is remarkably useful for wooden components, and I print cards on cheap paper and drop them in cheap sleeves. I can only imagine how much of a savings this is for people in countries with big import duties. Bits is cheap.

THIS game, by the way, is not on the Print 'n Play list on Wargamevault.com. I just looked (and remembered that there's about a dozen titles I'd love to purchase . . . Christmas time maybe.) She has 55 titles up there, surprised this one isn't on the list. The designer is a local guy, I'd like to support him.

I think Hollandspiele is "publishing" some of the most innovative games coming out right now. You ignore them to your detriment. I'm eyeballing the Antarctica game next. It's getting a lot of chatter on BGG.

(FYI -- www.wargamevault.com/browse.php?keywords=hollandspiele&page=1 )
Matt Thrower's Avatar
Matt Thrower replied the topic: #315105 14 Oct 2020 05:28

Msample wrote: Worthington seems to be the non block version of Columbia - occasional interesting subjects, but executed in a bland and somewhat cookie cutter manner. The only game of theirs that remotely interested me was HEARTS AND MINDS, which was decidedly a mixed bag. Whenever I see a new release mentioned, further investigation leaves me shaking my head and walking away, an easy pass.


Worthington have at least one very good game which is, ironically, a block game: Holdfast Eastfront aka Holdfast Russia. They exported the successful Holdfast formula to a range of other theatres most of which seem to be pale shadows of the original.